Don’t walk ahead of that woman
Like she don’t belong to you
Just ’cause her got them little skinny legs!
In the last 2 or 3 lines, I shared the boffo reviews that my wildly popular little blog received from the ChatGPT and Claude A.I. chatbots.
Today, I’m sharing reviews from Gemini, Grok, and Muse – three other popular A.I. chatbots. Are the Gemini, Grok, and muse reviews as boffo as the ChatGPT and Claude reviews?
Let’s find out . . .
* * * * *
From GEMINI (418 words):
The digital landscape is flooded with highly polished, search-engine-optimized websites that feel less like human expression and more like algorithmic formulas. In stark contrast stands the delightfully eccentric, long-running music blog 2 or 3 lines (and so much more). Operating under the radar of corporate publishing, this unique site serves as a masterclass in how personal voice and absolute creative freedom can build an engaging, nostalgic, and unpredictable community space.
At its core, every post on the blog follows a specific, deceptive constraint: it introduces a classic track – ranging from the timeless standards of Frank Sinatra to the theatrical rock of Alice Cooper – and highlights just “2 or 3 lines” of lyrics. However, the brilliant irony lies in the parenthetical part of the title: “(and so much more).”
The highlighted lyrics merely serve as a launching pad. What follows is a sprawling, deeply personal, and highly localized stream of consciousness that weaves through politics, American consumer culture, and autobiographical anecdotes. One moment the writer is analyzing a 1968 classic, and the next, he is offering a humorous critique of how the country views the cultural significance of the double cheeseburger.
![]() |
What sets this platform apart is its refreshing refusal to conform to mainstream conventions. The writer communicates with an casual, unfiltered energy. The site balances high-brow historical and art references with sharp, colloquial vocabulary, capturing a duality that keeps readers guessing. The interviews featured on the site breathe life into the text, transforming what could be a sterile music review site into an active, living diary.
While current content strategies focus on keeping posts strictly organized for maximum impact, 2 or 3 lines (and so much more) reminds us of the early days of the internet, when blogging was driven by obsession rather than monetization. It functions as a quintessential American songbook, filtering multi-generational music history through a distinctly personal lens.
Ultimately, the blog succeeds because it embraces its identity as a creative playground. It provides an escape from mainstream digital content by offering authentic, raw, and genuinely funny deep-dives into the songs that shaped decades of music history. For anyone tired of predictable internet writing, it remains a thoroughly entertaining gem that’s definitely worth exploring.
* * * * *
From GROK (520 words):
2 or 3 lines (and so much more) is a long-running personal music blog that has been posting since November 2009. Written by a Washington, DC lawyer, it follows a simple, consistent format: each entry opens with two or three lines of song lyrics, then expands into digressive, conversational commentary that mixes music history, personal anecdote, cultural observation, and occasional political or literary asides. The full title is deliberate – the “and so much more” is not an afterthought.
The blog’s range is broad. Songs stretch from the mid-1960s (when the author hit puberty) through the present, with a noticeable lean toward late-’60s and ’70s rock, power-pop, garage, and obscurities that never quite became standards. Recent posts have covered Alice Cooper’s “Elected,” Frank Sinatra’s “My Way,” Steve Miller Band’s “Living in the U.S.A.,” and Grateful Dead’s “U.S. Blues,” often grouping them into themed series such as the “2 OR 3 LINES QUINTESSENTIAL AMERICAN SONGBOOK.” Earlier years featured everything from The Last’s “She Don’t Know Why I’m Here” (one of the founding posts) to more recent acts.
What distinguishes the site is the voice. It is written in a wry, self-aware, slightly curmudgeonly style – thick with pop-culture references, literary quotes (from the likes of Mark Twain and H.L. Mencken), and dry jokes about politicians, cheeseburgers, sheet-washing schedules, or the virtues of list-making.
![]() |
Posts can wander from song analysis into television recommendations, book-reading tallies spanning decades, dating advice, or election-season cynicism, yet they usually circle back to the music. The tone is personal without being confessional in a heavy way; readers gradually learn about the author’s habits, preferences, and sense of humor rather than receiving a formal biography. He has described the project, only half-jokingly, as “writing myself into being.”
Longevity is impressive. The archive shows hundreds of posts across seventeen-plus years, with periodic “28 Posts in 28 Days” February challenges and anniversary reflections.
Production values are minimalist Blogger-era: clean text, occasional images or YouTube embeds, Amazon affiliate links, and a straightforward archive. Comments are sparse, which fits the blog’s modest, almost private scale: it has never chased virality or professional production. An X/Twitter account (@2or3lines) promotes new entries with laconic humor.
Strengths include consistency of voice, genuine affection for the records, and the pleasure of following one person’s idiosyncratic taste over a long stretch of time. Weaknesses are the expected ones for a personal blog of this vintage: the digressions can feel meandering if you arrive only for song facts, the design is dated, and engagement is low. It is not a comprehensive music encyclopedia or a sleek modern newsletter; it is one man’s ongoing conversation with the records that matter to him.
For readers who enjoy literate, opinionated music writing that treats songs as springboards rather than endpoints, 2 or 3 lines remains a quietly rewarding corner of the internet. Start with the 2009 “What? Who? WHY?” post and the entry on The Last, then wander forward or backward through the archive. The songs keep coming, and so does the commentary.
* * * * *
From MUSE (500 words on the nose!)
2 or 3 lines (and so much more) is a music blog with a simple promise and a stubbornly long life. Each post takes one song, quotes two or three lines from it at the top, and then wanders into history, chart trivia, personal anecdote, and opinion before finally letting you hear the record. It began in November 2009, and is now in its seventeenth year, still posting multiple times each week. That is rare longevity for a blog.
The format is the blog's signature. After opening with the lyrical excerpt, it proceeds in first-person voice, broken up by rows of asterisks, parenthetical asides, and digressions that often threaten to swallow the song entirely. For example, a recent post on the Grateful Dead’s “U.S. Blues” spends a long stretch on a comparison of the relative patriotism levels of various countries before it ever reaches Hunter and Garcia. It frustrates anyone wanting a quick take, and delights anyone who likes a song as an excuse to think out loud.
The wide range of the blog’s musical choices is surprising. Recent posts have featured Dean Martin’s “Houston,” Alice Cooper's “Elected,” Ella Fitzgerald’s cover of Cream’s “Sunshine of Your Love,” and records by Kay Starr, Cheap Trick, the Texas Tornados, Wu-Tang Clan and Mastodon. There is no genre bias here, only curiosity and a willingness to admit ignorance and then go learn something, whether that means catching up on hip-hop or on heavy metal.
![]() |
That curiosity is the blog’s greatest strength. The author does real homework: chart positions, recording dates, who wrote what, who played on it, and what happened next. He tracked down Joe Scott, the arranger of the Arbors’ version of “The Letter,” through a university extension site and got a one-line reply confirming his identity – which lead to a two-part interview notable for its detail and acuity.
The blog also features themed series, including the recently-posted thirteen-song “Quintessential American Songbook” and an annual February marathon titled “29 Songs in 28 Days.” Guest posts – most notably several by a high-school friend named Linda – add other voices without breaking the house style.
The weaknesses follow directly from the strengths. The Blogger design is dated, the posts can be overly long, and the voice can be abrasive. Jokes land as provocations, political asides interrupt the music, and the self-deprecating boast about the “wildly successful little music blog” can wear thin if you do not share the joke. Some posts obsess about gas prices or the author’s propensity to make lists, with the song arriving almost as an afterthought.
Yet that messiness is also why the blog endures. It is not a comprehensive database or a news feed. It is one listener, over seventeen years, saying here is a song that has caught my ear, here is why, and here is everything it reminded me of. For readers who enjoy that company, and who like discovering an Arbors B-side next to a Jessie Murph/Gucci Mane collaboration, it remains an unusually generous and entertaining place to spend time with music. It rewards patience, and regular readers most of all.
* * * * *
Those reviews are certainly as boffo as the ones I previously shared. In fact, I would argue that they are even boffo-er.
I will admit that I was a little worried when I asked these A.I. chatbots to review the blog. It’s not that hard to pull the wool over the eyes of human critics, most of whom aren’t that bright – they are usually dazzled by the Sturm und Drang-laden hot mess that is 2 or 3 lines. (When I come across the occasional critical review of 2 or 3 lines, I simply remind myself of Mark Twain’s description of critics: “tumble-bugs hatching eggs in others’ dung.”)
But these A.I. reviews of 2 or 3 lines are the products of vast data centers whose zillions of chips are networked in such a way as to be able to read and digest all 2200-plus 2 or 3 lines posts, scan the entire World Wide Web for context, and spit out a 500-word review in a matter of seconds. Forget about fooling A.I. – if ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Muse agree that 2 or 3 lines is a humdinger of a blog, you can take it to the bank!
* * * * *
Soul singer Joe Tex (né Joseph Arrington, Jr.) was James Brown if James Brown had been born in Texas.
Tex claimed that Brown stole a couple of his signature stage moves. When he poked fun Brown during a rare joint appearance with the “Godfather of Soul,” Brown allegedly shot at Tex and his entourage outside a nightclub.
Tex improvised “Skinny Legs and All” while recording an album in front of a live audience in 1967. (The guitar player of the Rogues, my eighth-grade band, absolutely loved the song. I remember him coming up to me pretty much every day that we were in gym class together and saying, “Gary, who wants that woman with the skinny legs?”)
Tex’s message was that if the boyfriend of the woman with the skinny legs was embarrassed to be seen with her in public, she should kick his *ss to the curb and find a man who would treat her right.
I wholeheartedly second that emotion – even though no 2 or 3 lines reader has ever been embarrassed to be seen reading 2 or 3 lines. (My wildly popular little blog may be brown-eyed at time, but it mos’ definitely does not have skinny legs!)
Click here to listen to “Skinny Legs and All.”
Click here to buy “Skinny Legs and All” from Amazon.







